1. The business problem
What can public discharge data tell you about your hospital’s market, and where does it stop?
Every hospital wants to know how it is doing against its neighbors: who is gaining patients, in which services, and where residents are going instead. Public discharge data is one of the few sources that answers those questions for everyone in a market at once.
This matters because market decisions (investing in a service, recruiting a specialty, responding to a competitor) depend on knowing demand and share. But discharge data answers “where did patients go?” not “was it worth it?” Mixing those up is the most common mistake.
2. What the evidence can reveal
Verified fact The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) is New York State’s data system for patient-level information on hospital discharges, ambulatory surgery and emergency department visits. De-identified public-use files are published by the state. Where charges appear in such data, they are not the same as what was paid or what care cost.
Within those limits, discharge data can support several useful comparisons:
- Calculated Volume and share: discharges by hospital and service category across a defined market.
- Calculated Trends: which hospitals and services are gaining or losing over time.
- Calculated Patient origin (where the data supports it): which areas supply a hospital’s patients, and which residents go elsewhere.
- Information gap Not included: reimbursement, cost, contribution margin, the reason a patient chose a hospital, or causation.
The synthetic market in this article is illustrative and is not New York data. It is built to behave like the public discharge data described above, so you can practice reading it safely.
3. Investigate the problem
In the synthetic market, our hospital’s discharges moved from 6,043 to 5,888 (−2.6%) while the market moved from 21,800 to 22,300 (+2.3%). Our share moved from 27.7% to 26.4%. Illustrative
Illustrative: discharges and share in a synthetic five-hospital market, FY25 to FY26| Hospital | Discharges FY25 | Discharges FY26 | Share FY25 | Share FY26 |
|---|
| Demo Community Hospital (us) | 6,043 | 5,888 | 27.7% | 26.4% |
|---|
| St. Mary’s Regional | 5,113 | 5,815 | 23.5% | 26.1% |
|---|
| Riverside Health | 4,275 | 4,095 | 19.6% | 18.4% |
|---|
| County General | 3,630 | 3,702 | 16.7% | 16.6% |
|---|
| Valley Medical | 2,739 | 2,800 | 12.6% | 12.6% |
|---|
Calculated The market grew modestly and we shrank, so our share slipped, while St. Mary’s Regional gained 2.6 pts of share. Within our own discharges, Obstetrics fell 13.5%, Orthopedics 3.2% and Oncology 6.3%, while General Surgery rose 5.4%.
Hypothesis Share loss in specific services could reflect a competitor’s new physicians or program, a change in access, or a referral shift. Discharge data can show that it happened and where. It cannot show why, or whether the lost cases were ones we would have wanted.