1. The business problem
Is demand for a service growing, and is the hospital sharing in it?
Hospitals often judge a service by their own volume: it is up, so demand is up; it is down, so demand is falling. But volume depends on both the size of the market and the hospital’s share of it, and the two can move in opposite directions.
This matters because a hospital with falling volume in a growing market is in a very different position from one with falling volume in a shrinking market. The first has a share problem. The second has a market that is moving away.
2. What the evidence can reveal
Evaluating demand takes four pieces, each answering a different question:
- Calculated Market size and trend by service category: is total demand growing?
- Calculated Our volume and share: are we keeping pace?
- Calculated Competitors’ volume and share: who is capturing growth?
- Information gap Drivers of demand, such as population, age mix, referral patterns and care that is moving to outpatient settings, which discharge data does not show.
Verified fact Public discharge data supports the first three. It counts inpatient discharges, so it understates demand for services that are shifting to outpatient settings. That is a known limit when reading trends.
3. Investigate the problem
In the synthetic market, total discharges grew 2.3% while ours moved −2.6%, so our share fell from 27.7% to 26.4%. Illustrative That is a share problem, not a market problem: demand grew and the hospital did not share in it.
Calculated The pattern differs by category. Our General Surgery discharges rose 5.4%, so we are holding our own there. Obstetrics fell 13.5%, Orthopedics 3.2% and Oncology 6.3%, so those need a closer look to see whether the market shrank, a competitor grew, or both.
Hypothesis Because the experience counts inpatient discharges, a category that is shifting to outpatient care can look like falling demand. That is a limit of the data. Combining discharge data with outpatient information is part of a complete demand picture.